|
Post by Sly Fox on Jul 18, 2005 0:22:46 GMT -5
LU pitching coach and former classmate of mine, Randy Tomlin, gets a mention in this New York Times article:
|
|
|
Post by PAmedic on Jul 18, 2005 7:56:38 GMT -5
I seem to remember a movement some years ago to eliminate Alum bats in the NCAA. whatever became of that?
also, since I'm in a good mood today: nice find on that article SLY, you must have a customized search engine to come up with this stuff!
|
|
|
Post by Sly Fox on Jul 18, 2005 20:11:43 GMT -5
What the NCAA did was force the manufacturers to come up with bats that weren't as dangerous. They are supposed to act mor elike wood bats even though they still make that ridiculous 'PING'.
|
|
|
Post by PAmedic on Jul 19, 2005 3:51:08 GMT -5
Don't understand the theory on NOT switching over. Originally I guess it was to save HS/colleges on money for new bats all the time (PUHLEEEZ), but you're not getting a true picture of these guys capabilities. Sorta inflates everyones' power, though I guess if everyone's using it equalizes. Using that logic- maybe we should hand out steroids to everyone! More of a problem when assessing talent for the pro's I guess.
|
|
|
Post by Sly Fox on Jul 19, 2005 7:24:35 GMT -5
The cost of broken bats would be very expensive for programs not in the upper echelon of Division I. That's why there's been little effort to change the current setup. The powerhouses schools all get free gear from the manufacturer. But there's no way any wooden bat maker would want to give away all that lumber to a school like ours.
There also were far too many pitchers getting hurt with the old bats firing lasers back at a guy finishing up his follow-thru.
|
|
|
Post by PAmedic on Jul 19, 2005 12:30:04 GMT -5
Not that I doubt you SLY, but I have a HARD time believing that- statistically speaking- sooo many guys were injured that the masses were screaming to go metal.
and I bet we spend more on cleats for the football team than we "would" on "wood".
|
|
|
Post by Thekid2003 on Aug 1, 2005 9:26:40 GMT -5
Hey guys, first, it would definitely be cheaper to use the wooden bats. We go through metal bats just as quick as any wooden bats. Easton lets us return the bats just as soon as they crack or dent which some times is just 1 or 2 wks the same as any wooden bat before it breaks, and each of those metals is about $250, and a really good wood is only $50. And SLY, we wouldn't even have to pay for the wood, we don't even pay for metal, Easton has us sponsored and guys get new bats just about every week. And there are plenty of people who could make wood bats for colleges in richmond, beach, and other places all over the place. Each college summer league all the guys get sponsored bats through the whole summer anyway, and that's not even for the real college season, so it would be no problem using the wood. It would also definitely be a lot better game, and give the scouts some real good looks at kids.
|
|
|
Post by PAmedic on Aug 1, 2005 10:49:32 GMT -5
thanks for the perspective kid2k3, and thanks for backing me up against the crazy Texan.
are ya on the team this year?
|
|
|
Post by Sly Fox on Aug 1, 2005 14:10:37 GMT -5
All I am telling you is the word from the NCAA when this subject came up a few years back when they chose to use the dulled down metal bats.
And while DI programs have no problem getting bat deals, its a different story for DIIs and DIIIs. And any change would have to be implemented across the board.
|
|
|
Post by Sly Fox on Aug 5, 2005 8:49:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Aug 18, 2005 13:49:49 GMT -5
As far as replacing the wood bats...it is not the cost of replacing the bats. It is all about other dollars...the money that Easton and Louisville pay for endorsements and the such. They played a large part in all the deals.
|
|
|
Post by LesGeft on Oct 25, 2019 6:29:11 GMT -5
Viagra Trh Pharmacy Buy Doxycycline For Humans <a href=http://rxbill6.com>cialis viagra levitra kaufen rezeptfrei</a> Nolvadex 20mg Prix buy accutane in canada Vast Viagra Delivery
|
|