|
Post by Stevev on Dec 12, 2005 13:19:06 GMT -5
That excuse only goes so far. Look at our women's team. Overall it is younger than the men's team and they are competitive even in their losses to tough ACC competition. It is not a question of youth right now. It is not having enough talent to be competitive. Simple as that.
|
|
|
Post by PittLU on Dec 12, 2005 13:53:57 GMT -5
Good point. We are able to recruit better talent since we have a pedigree of winning. With the men, you have to build team chemistry to overcome the "athletic deficiency". Once you become a winner, you will attract better athletes, but attracting better athletes is the cart before the horse - unless you are a master recruiter......
|
|
|
Post by realist on Dec 12, 2005 14:09:18 GMT -5
Winning breeds better recruits. Who was the class after the 4th championship we won (and before the 2 year drought?) Bradshaw, Williams, Martin---3 out of the 5 starters. Chemistry has a lot to do with it, but WU was able to succeed last year with really only Shuler seeing major court time in previous season. I've always thought that going to JUCO route was basically selling yourself short. By the time they get adjusted and into the system, they really only have a year left. HP usually gets some good athletes but they are mainly JUCO's, at least until this year, and they always seem to come up short---breaking down in tough, big games.
|
|
|
Post by Stevev on Dec 12, 2005 15:34:14 GMT -5
One thing about our women's team is that they rarely get JUCO's or even transferes from other div 1 colleges. They depend on high school and overseas recruiting to run the show and some make immediate contributions (for example Feenstra, Tharp, Frazee, the Wilkersons, Kisseleva, Fricke, and Walker all contributed their freshman year and even lead the team in various catagories such as scoring and rebounding. Or maybe I am making an unfair comparision here between our teams. I don't know. Maybe Carey Green is that much better a coach than Dunton.
|
|
|
Post by flameshaw on Dec 12, 2005 15:35:30 GMT -5
If we want to use the "players need to be here long enough and play together for a year or more to be effective" excuse, then who is ultimately responsible for making that happen? Isn't that part of recruiting? Know who you are recruiting (as much as possible, i know it is not an exact science), know who is leaving when (based on 4 years and any redshirt time), what positions are critical based on tenure of current players, etc? I know Randy has only been here a fairly short time, but we have not made much of an impact over that time either.
If we really want to move to a better conference and be competitive, we should have as our minimum goal to win the BS most years and always be very competitive within the conference. Until then we can't talk about the conference being a hinderance to our progess.
|
|
|
Post by Stevev on Dec 12, 2005 15:54:42 GMT -5
I think that you are right about the conference not being that much of a hindrance. We are not exactly dominating the conference over the last few years and only won it 2 years ago due to Winthrop having injury issues. The Big South is one of the lowest rated conferences in the country with only Winthrop making any sort of noise outside the conference. Right now there is no one else in the conference worth mentioning right now.
|
|
|
Post by LUconn on Dec 12, 2005 16:18:15 GMT -5
The past couple of years I have come to the conclusion that I'd take a great Xs and Os coach over a great recruiting coach anyday. Recruits come from winning, as realist pointed out. Many of the nations best recruiters don't win as they should. But coaches who coach well, build up average players into good players. as the program betters so do the recruits. its a process. I like Randy and I'll continue to support him until I feel the program is going completely in the wrong direction, but I've always felt he was a great recruiter but have often questioned his game time decisions. Pretty much the opposite of what I'd like to see. Alas, you can't argue with his success thus far.
|
|
|
Post by Two Cents on Dec 12, 2005 16:26:28 GMT -5
Losing Coach Davis is hurting big time... in all areas.
|
|
|
Post by formerflame on Dec 12, 2005 19:09:09 GMT -5
Losing J Meyer was THE downward turning point in our program. His focus, practice organization, and game preparation was a real advantage for our players. Too bad because we had established the marque program in TBS: winning seasons, campus pride and spirit, community support, and a first class reputation among our peers and opponents. AND our student athletes went to class and graduated under his leadership. He obviously has done very well since his departure (Conference Championships and NCAA Tournaments @ Winthrop and Butler) and we have only one winning season to show for our nine years of Flames Basketball.
|
|
|
Post by Sly Fox on Dec 12, 2005 19:44:42 GMT -5
Its too bad he's stuck on Snyder's staff at Mizzou. They are having a terrible season before entering the tough Big 12 schedule. Jeff should be a head coach somewhere right now.
|
|
|
Post by Stevev on Dec 12, 2005 21:49:57 GMT -5
I agree that losing Jeff Meyer was the downfall for the program. His last 2 seasons were his best with some good out of conference wins and some very competitive games vs major conference teams such as Virginia Tech, Auburn, Virginia, TCU, and others. Those years the average attendence was between 5000 and 6000 per home game. Now we have trouble drawing half that many with a student enrollment that is double now. His programs at both div 1 and 2 were very consistent from year to year and brought a level of pride and recognition that has been lacking for many years. His last team was without a doubt his best and actually had a realistic chance at a 13 or 14 seed in the tournament if they would have won that last game (and they definately should have). Besides I remember the Big South being rated much higher back then too, certainly better than it is now. It is a shame LU couldn't build on his accomplishments. He built a great foundation but it simply went to waste as time went on.
|
|
|
Post by eddantes on Dec 13, 2005 6:58:16 GMT -5
So what, we won the championship when we had guys like Ryan Mantlo and Gabe Martin together for two years, with Larry Blair and Brian Woodson in their first years there.
Sure, having players play together for years is great. But it also helps if you have several quality players. Back in the 2002-03 season, we had three players averaging in double-digits -- and two others were pretty close to it.
We can't win with just one scoring option (Blair). We tried that with Chris Caldwell, and we saw how far that got us.
|
|
|
Post by guestforever on Dec 13, 2005 9:31:53 GMT -5
I think the three games against Longwood, Buffalo and Lipscomb tell us a lot about how Liberty will do in the conference this year. Rebounding,lack of a post presence and only 1 shooter are major problems. The conference teams will either shut Blair down and force the others to try and score or let Blair get his 25-30 points and still beat Liberty. I don't want to get into why he left, but the lack of David Dees on the court is killing this team. Not only could he shoot but he also created scoring opportunities for Blair. No one is doing that now. Blair is having to create many of the shots he is taking. Expending that much energy combined with the amount of minutes he is playing could lead to injury or fatigue later in the season.
|
|
|
Post by SCAR on Dec 13, 2005 10:29:08 GMT -5
Blair will still be able to score once he is in conference. However I predict that Anthony Smith will be the guy to start taking and making more shots once conference play starts. Fellas, this team is not ready to play. Coach Dunton has told us that on this board and in public. They have to grow up fast. Without a back to the basket threat, you cannot win in college basketball. Trust me I know from first hand experience. When I played on those early D1 teams we had Bailey Alston throwing in 27 a night and we finished 11-17 two years in a row. He would get his points but teams would eat us alive in the post at both ends of the court. We couldn't stop them and the only back to the basket points we would get was when we would post Bailey or me whoever the smaller guard on the other team would be on. Losing Dees was big IMO because he gave you a back to the basket guy and a guy to go to in the clutch as well. Losing Robinson and Miller too hurt because now Russell has to play and he still is not quite ready to do so. This could be a long year for Liberty but I think the future can be bright for this team. Winthrop is really good and we are fighting an up hill battle from the start. Losing those guys made it that much more difficult...Also I want to address 1 other thing. Winthrop is really good right now and in the Marshall era they have garnered some national attention. However I get the feeling that people on this board think they have a winning tradition. The fact is before Marshall in the Dan Kenney Era they were annually one of the worst teams in the country and certainly in the Big South. They had no fans, no players and no chance of winning. The past 7 years have been great for them and they are to be commended and Marshall has done a great job but we need to keep perspective here. Liberty will be competitive in the Big South this season. I agree with a lot of what Realist and WEF have said (too much to go into with all the posts) and I want to echo 2 things. Winthrop is good for the Big South and 2nd, we love having WEF and Realist on this board.
|
|
|
Post by realist on Dec 13, 2005 11:32:15 GMT -5
Thanks for the sentiment Scar. Blair will certainly get his points in conference. Just from looking at box scores, the inside game is where you need help. Looks like Bigby, Eck, and Monroe are getting in foul trouble---which is probably them having to adjust to the speed of the game at this level. Bradshaw and Williams did the same thing two years ago.
I was there at the end of the Kinney era, beginning of Marshall and you are correct. Kinney's teams were awful, not necessarily b/c of talent (waterman and groves were recruited by him) but b/c he was an awful coach. No fan attendance, nothing. All it takes is the right guy and a commitment. Marshall has done more for the athletic program in general than men's basketball, he showed what athletic success could do for a school.
|
|
|
Post by SCAR on Dec 13, 2005 15:33:40 GMT -5
Realist, I knew you would be understand what I was trying to say. When it all comes together nicely, you can really build on it and that is what Winthrop has done. They came out of nowhere and now they have a very good mid-major program year in and year out. Tyson Waterman was good. I loved watching Marcus White and him do battle. Also Heson Groves was pretty decent. Those are the only guys we would even try to stop if I recall.
|
|
|
Post by jcmanson on Dec 13, 2005 15:38:10 GMT -5
I would be the first person to admit that I am dissapointed in our overall record at this point. I think we should have beaten Longwood and Lipscomb, and the Buffalo game was a toss-up in my mind. However, I believe we are reading into the non-conference games too much. Under Dunton we seem to always struggle somewhat in the non-conference games (even the 03-04 team), but when it is time for the conference season the guys are always ready to play. I'm not saying we will finish first, but I am saying that we should go at least 7-1 at home, and hopefully get as many as 4 wins on the road. If we do that, I think we all will say this was a positive season. I don't think it's unrealistic that we can do that either. We need to stay behind these players and our coach. This is our team, don't give up on them.
|
|
Tired of Hearing It
Guest
|
Post by Tired of Hearing It on Dec 13, 2005 17:13:40 GMT -5
Most of you have talked about the chemistry and needing to retain players. Formerflame says, “Losing J Meyer was THE downward turning point in our program” … Two Cents says, “Losing Coach Davis is hurting big time” … SCAR says, “Losing Dees was big IMO … Losing Robinson and Miller too hurt ...” Think about this: Dunton ran Meyer and Dees out of town. Dunton ran two-thirds of his coaching staff off, plus his director of operations. Whenever I hear him talk he’s always making excuses. During his first three seasons he’s 45-45 .500 with one title –although he was 18-15 that year – he’s always talked about making LU a Mid-Major power, but so far we’re not even a power in our own conference. Maybe there’s a reason there is a mass exodus every year: Dunton!
|
|
|
Post by HoldMyOwn on Dec 13, 2005 18:15:36 GMT -5
Dunton ran Meyer and Dees out of town. Dunton ran two-thirds of his coaching staff off Meyer was run out by no other but himself...I will agree that D and Davis had a few issues as do most coach's and ass. coach's but Davis was and always will be a head coach and it's not easy to just step down and become someone's assistant coach
|
|
|
Post by first formerflame on Dec 13, 2005 22:05:35 GMT -5
Meyer QUIT and things were held together by Dunton during those years. Stop your gripping some of you sound like a bunch of gossips. Dunton recruited most everyone of us during the 1990's and kept us here even when we wanted to quit ala Dees. Even Scar knows that. The best is yet to come watch. So he has a tough year and everybody wants to kick and scream baloney. The man will put some com.petitve team on the floor. Meyer had the best talent in the league and only one championship in eight years. Dunton has played the toughest schedules in the programs history and no one has matched his second/first/second run in three years after taking over. Don't forget Woodson was never above 60% last season if he is healthy who knows. But injuries play a role. Our politics and personal attacks choke the ability for us to support. It is a shame. Meyer, Dees and Robinson quit not run out of town don't misrepresent. Beat Dunton up while you can 'cause help is on the way and some of us really do understand what it means to go 2-1-2 in any league. So Coach D rebuild if you must I am with you and I did send a check to support.
|
|
|
Post by HoldMyOwn on Dec 13, 2005 22:22:53 GMT -5
AT LEAST I'M NOT ALONE ON THIS!!!!!!! why are other schools so loyal to their teams and yet here we are getting a rope ready after a few losing seasons....Football was painful, yet you still have to go and support them or your not a true fan...Basketball may be painful at times, but you have to go...b/c good times are ahead...yet here we say we have this "bond" called Christianity yet we turn our backs on the one school in this country that is a true Godly school and competitive at the D1 level…of all schools to be loyal, wouldn’t it be us And please when I say loyal don’t give me some crap about Hubbard or Karcher….people get fired, it’s life, but it is up to us to support the decisions that Liberty makes b/c we care about the school (and if you don’t, then why are wasting your time on firehouse)….guys support our teams, all of them, this fair weather crap has to go I think I just opened up a can of worms…go figure a Winthrop fan started this thread
|
|
|
Post by krh44 on Dec 13, 2005 22:54:07 GMT -5
Holdmyown I agree w/ you about being loyal. We can not expext these caoches to win and pull in big recruits if we have empty stands. Most LU fans are fair weather fans like at most schools. I don't understand why bball can't pull in bigger crowds w/ the size of the student body. What else is there to do in Lynchburg? Look at the girls most LU fans who graduated before 95 or 96 probably never went to a girls basketball game but I Bet you everyone was watching last March on ESPN. ALso Meyer quit but if I brought a program from high school level to playing UNC respectivly and was told that I had to win the Tournament that year or else I would have done the same. Most coaches would have done the same. Yes we had the talent and should have went to the tourney more than once in the 90s but we didn't. So we went from 20 win years to what? My question would be if winning the BSC if your expextation for the coach why did we let Mel take LU to the worst program in the country? How long are we going to wait? I think Dunton is a good coach and will support him but with no divisions I wins yet this year and getting beat by two teams who just went D1 in the past few years. It doesn't make sense.
|
|
|
Post by LUconn on Dec 14, 2005 7:21:12 GMT -5
I really don't understand why everybody at this school flips out every year when we're underacheiving in December. It's the same story every single year. I don't understand how you can just turn on the guy who's got our program headed in the right direction. You guys act like we're entitled to have 20 wins every season because we were good for a couple of years way back when. And whoever mentioned gossip, good point. I think I've read and heard more gossip from bitter fans than I've heard from the girls at lunch when I was 12. Yeah, Randy ran Meyer out of town so Mel could be hired so he would fail miserably and Randy could triumphantly return and look like a hero. Man, what a plan. We may have a bad year this year, that's still to be determined in conference play, but you can't be good every year. Even the mighty Winthrop had a couple of down years.
|
|
|
Post by flameshaw on Dec 14, 2005 8:19:50 GMT -5
Without divulging sources, I can say without any doubt that all is not what it seemed between Randy and Jeff. Randy was brought back after the Mel debacle because someone very close to the throne, campaigned continuosly for it and really, they couldn't attract anyone else in the timeframe they were dealing with. I am not a Jeff, Mel or Dunton fan but I am a fan of LU and support the department financially every year at a fairly high level and certainly at a sacrifical level personally. I only want us to get better each year. I have no unrealistic expectations, I just don't believe the current staff can/will get it done. I hope I am wrong.
|
|
|
Post by insider on Dec 14, 2005 8:52:45 GMT -5
With all due respect --Support is support not casting doubt. A house divided can not stand. Every program is working hard to advance. As Dunton said yesterday at Flames Club Lipscomb's Allen Arena would be the best facility in the Big South. Other institution have resources and advantages as well. We must compete together. Let's help Rocco and Dunton financially, prayerfully and even with recruiting leads in our areas. If we can contribute to the building process not the tearing down or spraying negative vibes all of us will be benefitted. The past is the past both with successes and failures moving forward is a process and I have been here long enough to see the university rise from financial desperation on the verge of closing to a growing vibrant university. If the coaches can advance the programs it is best done with real boosters and real supporters not snipers.
|
|
|
Post by flameshaw on Dec 14, 2005 12:51:27 GMT -5
With all due respect --Support is support not casting doubt. A house divided can not stand. Every program is working hard to advance. As Dunton said yesterday at Flames Club Lipscomb's Allen Arena would be the best facility in the Big South. Other institution have resources and advantages as well. We must compete together. Let's help Rocco and Dunton financially, prayerfully and even with recruiting leads in our areas. If we can contribute to the building process not the tearing down or spraying negative vibes all of us will be benefitted. The past is the past both with successes and failures moving forward is a process and I have been here long enough to see the university rise from financial desperation on the verge of closing to a growing vibrant university. If the coaches can advance the programs it is best done with real boosters and real supporters not snipers. Are you suggesting that you cannot be a real supporter unless you agree or accept the stautus quo or support the staff of a particular program or sport? If that is true, which it is not, then we don't have any football supporters on this board, which also means they are not LU athletic supporters ;D. I would think that diverse thoughts should be embraced here, especially since the alternative is for all of us to be robots and sit around our computers and sing kumbyah each morning. I prefer to think that my sacrificial giving to the program, driving over 100 miles to attend games regularly, speaks a whole lot louder than an occasional disagreement or statement of fact.
|
|
|
Post by HoldMyOwn on Dec 14, 2005 15:20:16 GMT -5
No, I think the point is...at Penn St. a few years ago, there were ton's of Boosters that wanted Joe Pa out, yet they would still grill out before every game just like they would if they were #1 in the nation...I just think that we cast the stone a lot quicker before other schools would when I think we should be more loyal...
|
|
|
Post by insider on Dec 14, 2005 15:31:02 GMT -5
Some great Proverbs to live by: 18:17 " The first to present his case seems right, till another comes forward and questions him." 18:21 " The tongue has the power of life and death, and those who love it will eat it's fruit." 20:19 "A gossip betrays confidence;so avoid a man who talks too much." 17:27 "A man of knowledgw uses words with restraint." 19:2 "It is not good to have zeal without knowledge,nor to be hasty and miss the way." 14:29 "A patient man has great understanding, but a quick-tempered man displays folly." 12:18-20 "Reckless words pierce like a sword, but the tongue of the wise brings healing. Truthful lips endire forever,but a lying tongue lasts only a moment. There is deceit in the gearts of those who plot evil, but joy for those who promote peace." GO FLAMES!
|
|
|
Post by PittLU on Dec 14, 2005 16:15:27 GMT -5
Wow - there is a ton of banter on the subject of loyalty.
As Dr. Falwell says, there is a fine line between faith and lunacy and vision is the path between the past and future. Now, I believe that in football, Coach Rocco is the right candidate to see Dr. Falwell's faith vision through. He has the background in recruiting (which is the foundation of any program) and studied under some sucessful coaches that are proven winners such as Tom Coughlin and Al Groh (H'burg would debate me on Groh). I believe that Coach Rocco has the pedigree and can fulfill Dr. Falwell's vision of a successful football program by being competitive in the Big South with the eventual jump to DI.
I do not know Coach Dunton, but I do know that we are competitive in the Big South every year. We have had a few tough losses so far this year, but jumping off the bandwagon after a tough loss is what seperates the posers from die hard fans. I should know a thing or two about being die hard fan since I am a Pittsburgh Pirates fan. We have been through two five year plans for success, a supposed revenue bump in building our own park to buy better players, but we have had 13 consecutive seasons of losing baseball. I feel jaded and lied to, but I am still a die hard season ticket holder.
I respect flameshaw for supporting the mens b-ball team at a personal sacrafice. You are a die hard fan. I think as a die hard fan, you have earned the right to question decisions when we see our team falter, but December is not the time in men's b-ball. We have two critical months remaining. If we are 3-26 at the end of the season, then we can point fingers and ask for answers, but not now when we havent even played a conference game. Coach Dunton has some glaring weaknesses on this team that he will have to address. Being the head coach, it all falls back on him. One thing is, and we have this board to prove it, he was forthcoming with the weaknesses. It is not like they caught him by suprise. He projected the lack of a frontcourt and big man, and was hoping some unseasoned youth would be able to step up. You can never project how a recruits athleticism and talent will translate to the actual game on the floor. You have to get the best players you can, retain them and hope they are healthy enough to give you 100% through a grueling season - not to mention be able to compete favorably against DI talent.
Dunton is .500 during his second tenure with LU with one Big South Championship and 2-1-2 the last three years with in the BSC. To me, that is pretty good. Do we want what Winthrop has - sure, but is making a coaching change a step in the right direction? All new coaches need time to install their system, hire their guys, recruit players for their system, etc. To me, .500 and 2-1-2 is a good start. Remember, we were 325 out of 325 when the Hankison area mercifully came to an end. If we start doing worse than what Dunton has done thus far, then you make the change, but a few non-conference losses with a young team does not dictate a coaching change.
I think we have too many uneducated fans who act in traditional fan ignorance and chant "fire the coach" when a team losses a few games they shouldnt . I will start a Fire Dunton Thread if at the end of the season there is compelling evidence that suggests his play calling and decisions were the reasons we lost the games, but at this point, I just dont see that. Blaming Dunton is too easy. The bottom line is there is not frontcourt. With no frontcourt and one playmaker - you are asking for problems. Is it Duntons fault we dont have that - yes and no. Some players may have transferred, but Dunton went into this season saying we have some young talent (in the frontcourt) that needs to step up - to me, that is a good enough answer. You cant sit your youth on the bench forever. You have to see what you have. If they dont produce, you either cut them, release them from scholly, and move on recruiting better talent. Dunton has brought in some great players and will continue to bring them in, but some great players dont produce out of the gate like a Larry Blair. Some players have to get the experience of a grind it out season before they know how to apply their talent to this game.
Sorry for the rant. I know all of us on this board are all ultra competitive an hate seeing our team lose. I am not going to say we all have to hold hands and suppor the team, but I am saying that if you are a die hard fan, you will stick by the team even though it sucks to lose.
|
|
GOAT
Junior Member
Posts: 55
|
Post by GOAT on Dec 14, 2005 16:55:11 GMT -5
I have been rolling all day reading everyone's wonderful opinions. It is still very early in the season and the team has only one legit scoring threat. Bottom Line it's hard to win like that. That is the hand Coach Dunton is dealt. Things will turn around but it is a process. You can't cure cancer with one treatment. By the way from a first hand experience, Coach Meyer and Coach Dunton complimented each other well they might have had pride issues but Coach Meyer was very well organized and detailed oriented and Coach Dunton ran the team.
|
|